Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Retention Rate and Safety of Secukinumab as a First-Line Biologic Agent in Axial Spondyloarthritis Compared to a First Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibitor: A Real-World, Longitudinal Study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Retention Rate and Safety of Secukinumab as a First-Line Biologic Agent in Axial Spondyloarthritis Compared to a First Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibitor: A Real-World, Longitudinal Study
Do you wish to request the book?
The Retention Rate and Safety of Secukinumab as a First-Line Biologic Agent in Axial Spondyloarthritis Compared to a First Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibitor: A Real-World, Longitudinal Study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Retention Rate and Safety of Secukinumab as a First-Line Biologic Agent in Axial Spondyloarthritis Compared to a First Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibitor: A Real-World, Longitudinal Study
2024
Overview
Background and objective Secukinumab (SECU) is a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) that has demonstrated effectiveness against axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA). However, in clinical practice, secukinumab is most commonly used as a second-line treatment after failure of or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). In this study, we aimed to compare the two-year drug retention between secukinumab and TNFi in biologic-naïve patients with ax-SpA, to estimate the remission/low disease activity (LDA) rates in both groups and assess the safety profiles. Methods This was a longitudinal observational study involving patients with ax-SpA who were biologic-naïve and were receiving SECU or TNFi between December 2019 and December 2021. The two-year therapeutic retention rate in both groups was determined. Remission and LDA rates obtained at 24 months according to the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) scale, as well as the safety profile, were compared between the two groups. Results Seventy-five patients were included in the study. Of them, 34.6% received SECU, while 65.3% received TNFi; 85.3% were males. The mean age was 37.8 ±9 years, the mean disease duration was 10.2 ±6.1 years, and the initial ASDAS-CRP was 3.5 ±0.8. At 24 months; the therapeutic retention rate was 70% for SECU and 66% for TNFi. The reasons for discontinuation were inefficacy (SECU: 11.5%, TNFi: 20.4%, p=0.33), side effects (SECU: 0, TNFi: 4.1%, p=0.29), and socioeconomic conditions (SECU: 15.5%, TNFi: 10.2%, p=0.51). The rate of patients achieving remission and LDA was comparable between the two groups: (remission - SECU: 23.1%, TNFi: 24.5%, p=0.92; LDA - SECU: 73.1%, TNFi: 73.5%, p=0.16). There was no statistically significant difference in the safety profile. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the effectiveness and safety of secukinumab for ax-SpA in biologic-naïve patients are comparable to those of TNFi.
Publisher
Cureus
Subject
