MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Middellangetermijnoverleving na open versus robotgeassisteerde radicale cystectomie in Nederland: resultaten van de ‘SNAPSHOT’ cystectomie
Middellangetermijnoverleving na open versus robotgeassisteerde radicale cystectomie in Nederland: resultaten van de ‘SNAPSHOT’ cystectomie
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Middellangetermijnoverleving na open versus robotgeassisteerde radicale cystectomie in Nederland: resultaten van de ‘SNAPSHOT’ cystectomie
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Middellangetermijnoverleving na open versus robotgeassisteerde radicale cystectomie in Nederland: resultaten van de ‘SNAPSHOT’ cystectomie
Middellangetermijnoverleving na open versus robotgeassisteerde radicale cystectomie in Nederland: resultaten van de ‘SNAPSHOT’ cystectomie

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Middellangetermijnoverleving na open versus robotgeassisteerde radicale cystectomie in Nederland: resultaten van de ‘SNAPSHOT’ cystectomie
Middellangetermijnoverleving na open versus robotgeassisteerde radicale cystectomie in Nederland: resultaten van de ‘SNAPSHOT’ cystectomie
Journal Article

Middellangetermijnoverleving na open versus robotgeassisteerde radicale cystectomie in Nederland: resultaten van de ‘SNAPSHOT’ cystectomie

2023
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Er is onvoldoende bekend over de middellangetermijnoverleving van niet-gemetastaseerd spierinvasieve blaaskanker (SIBC) na open (ORC) versus robotgeassisteerde (RARC) cystectomie, met of zonder neoadjuvante chemotherapie (NAC). Om de vijfjaarsoverleving na beide interventies en de invloed van NAC te onderzoeken, is een retrospectieve studie verricht in 19 Nederlandse ziekenhuizen tussen 2012 en 2015. Van de totaal 1.534 cT1-4N0-1-patiënten ondergingen 1.086 patiënten een ORC en 389 een RARC. De vijfjaarsoverleving was 51% na ORC (95%-BI 47–53) versus 58% na RARC (95%-BI 52–63); de hazard ratio na multivariabele correctie was 1,00 (95%-BI 0,84–1,20). 226 van de 965 cT2-4aN0-patiënten werden behandeld met NAC. Na case-control matching bleek (y)pT0 vaker voor te komen na NAC dan zonder NAC (31 vs. 15%; p  < 0,01). De beste vijfjaarsoverleving trad op bij patiënten met ypT0 na NAC, namelijk 89% (95%-BI 81–97). Concluderend laat deze deze studie bij patiënten met SIBC vergelijkbare vijfjaarsoverleving zien na ORC of na RARC. De beste overleving was bij patiënten die waren behandeld met NAC voorafgaand aan cystectomie. There is insufficient knowledge on intermediate-term survival of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) after open (ORC) versus robot-assisted (RARC) cystectomy, with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This retrospective study was performed in 19 Dutch hospitals between 2012 and 2015 to assess the five-year survival after both interventions and the influence of NAC. Out of 1,534 cT1-4N0-1-patients, 1,086 patients were treated with ORC and 389 with RARC. The 5‑year survival rate after ORC was 51% (95% CI 47–53) versus 58% after RARC (95% CI 52–63), hazard ratio 1.00 (95% CI 0.84–1.20) after multivariable analysis. 226 of 965 cT2-4aN0 patients were treated with NAC. More patients had ypT0 after NAC than after no NAC (31% vs 15%; p  < 0.01). The best five-year survival was in patients with ypT0 after NAC (89%; 95% CI 81–97). This study shows similar five-year survival of MIBC patients treated with ORC or RARC and shows that the best survival was after NAC.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V