Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
How do short‐term practice effects compare to biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease?
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
How do short‐term practice effects compare to biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease?
Do you wish to request the book?
How do short‐term practice effects compare to biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease?
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
How do short‐term practice effects compare to biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease?
2024
Overview
Background Practice effects on cognitive testing in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remain understudied, especially with how they compare to biomarkers of AD. The current study sought to add to this growing literature. Method Cognitively intact older adults (n = 68), those with amnestic MCI (n = 52), and those with mild AD (n = 45) repeated a brief battery of cognitive tests twice across one week, and they also completed a baseline amyloid PET scan, a baseline MRI, and a baseline blood draw to obtain APOE e4 status. Result The intact participants showed significantly larger practice effects than the other two groups on an overall composite measure, and those with MCI showed significantly larger practice effects than those with AD. For amyloid deposition, the intact participants had significantly less tracer uptake, whereas MCI and AD participants were comparable. For total hippocampal volumes, all three groups were significantly different in the expected direction (intact>MCI>AD). For APOE e4, the intact had significantly fewer copies of e4 than MCI and AD. Overall, the effect sizes of practice effects were significantly larger than effect sizes of biomarkers in 7 of the 9 comparisons (see Table). Conclusion Short‐term practice effects on cognitive tests appear to be a sensitive marker in late life cognitive disorders, as they separated groups better than commonly‐used biomarkers in AD. Further refinement of short‐term practice effects as a tool for clinical diagnosis, prognostic indication, and enrichment of clinical trials seems warranted.
