Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of fructification efficiency between reciprocal crosses in Coffea canephora
by
Ferrão, Romário Gava
, Ferrão, Maria Amélia Gava
, Rocha, Rodrigo Barros
, Riva-Souza, Elaine Manelli
, Verdin Filho, Abrão Carlos
, Fonseca, Aymbiré Francisco Almeida da
, Volpi, Paulo Sérgio
in
Cloning
/ Coffea canephora
/ Estimates
/ Fruit set
/ Genetic variability
/ Genotypes
/ Males
/ Pollen
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of fructification efficiency between reciprocal crosses in Coffea canephora
by
Ferrão, Romário Gava
, Ferrão, Maria Amélia Gava
, Rocha, Rodrigo Barros
, Riva-Souza, Elaine Manelli
, Verdin Filho, Abrão Carlos
, Fonseca, Aymbiré Francisco Almeida da
, Volpi, Paulo Sérgio
in
Cloning
/ Coffea canephora
/ Estimates
/ Fruit set
/ Genetic variability
/ Genotypes
/ Males
/ Pollen
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of fructification efficiency between reciprocal crosses in Coffea canephora
by
Ferrão, Romário Gava
, Ferrão, Maria Amélia Gava
, Rocha, Rodrigo Barros
, Riva-Souza, Elaine Manelli
, Verdin Filho, Abrão Carlos
, Fonseca, Aymbiré Francisco Almeida da
, Volpi, Paulo Sérgio
in
Cloning
/ Coffea canephora
/ Estimates
/ Fruit set
/ Genetic variability
/ Genotypes
/ Males
/ Pollen
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of fructification efficiency between reciprocal crosses in Coffea canephora
Journal Article
Comparison of fructification efficiency between reciprocal crosses in Coffea canephora
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
This study aimed to assess and compare the behavior of superior genotypes of Coffea canephora in terms of fruiting capacity using directed hybridizations in a full diallel design with reciprocals. Hybridizations were performed using 12 possible combinations between genotypes 02, 03, 23 and 83 from the Incaper breeding program. High estimates of the genotypic coefficient of determination in terms of the total number of pinheads per cross (TNP) and fruit set (FS) indicated variability of genetic nature. FS averaged 52,27 %, ranging from 31,32 % to 82,09 %, with the higher rates relating to clone 23 as the male parent. Differences were found between reciprocal crosses in the combinations with genotype 23, which emerged as the donor plant with the best fruiting rate, but poor receiving ability. Clone 83 prevailed as the best receiving plant and the least effective donor. In the comparison of these two genotypes, antagonism was observed in their behavior when they were used as pollen-donor plants (male parents) and pollen-receiver plants (female parents), highlighting their possible maternal effect. Crosses involving clones 02 and 03 showed no differences when used reciprocally. The estimates of genotypic correlations were negative for the four associations involving the FS characteristic, being of greater magnitude with TNP. Este trabajo tuvo como objetivo evaluar y comparar la eficiencia en la producción de frutos entre cruces recíprocos en Coffea canephora con el uso de hibridaciones controladas en un dialelo completo con diseño recíproco. Las hibridaciones se realizaron involucrando los genotipos 02, 03, 23 y 83 del programa de mejoramiento Incaper. Las estimaciones altas del coeficiente de determinación genotípica para el número total de frutos iniciados por cruzamiento (TNP) y la proporción de frutos (FS) indicaron una variabilidad de naturaleza genética. La FS promedio fue de 52,27 %, con un rango de 31,32 % a 82,09 %, siendo mayor con el clon 23 como progenitor masculino. Se encontraron diferencias entre cruces recíprocos en combinaciones con el genotipo 23, que se destacó como la planta donante con la mejor tasa en la producción de frutos, pero con habilidad receptora deficiente. El clon 83 se destacó como la mejor planta receptora y la peor donante. En la comparación de estos dos genotipos (23 y 83) se observó antagonismo en su comportamiento al ser utilizados como plantas donadoras de polen (progenitores masculinos) y plantas receptoras de polen (progenitores femeninos), evidenciando un posible efecto maternal. Los cruces entre los clones 02 y 03 no mostraron diferencias cuando se usaron recíprocamente. Las estimaciones de las correlaciones genotípicas fueron negativas para las asociaciones que involucraron la característica FS, siendo de mayor magnitud con TNP.
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.