Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Comparison of Graded Response and Rasch Partial Credit Models with Subjective Well-Being
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Comparison of Graded Response and Rasch Partial Credit Models with Subjective Well-Being
Do you wish to request the book?
A Comparison of Graded Response and Rasch Partial Credit Models with Subjective Well-Being
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A Comparison of Graded Response and Rasch Partial Credit Models with Subjective Well-Being
2000
Overview
Two multiple category item response theory models are compared using a data set of 52 mood terms with 713 subjects. Tellegen’s (1985) model of mood with two independent, unipolar dimensions of positive and negative affect provided a theoretical basis for the assumption of unidimensionality. Principle components analysis and item parameter tests supported the unidimensionality assumption. Comparative model data fit for the Samejima (1969) logistic model for graded responses and the Masters (1982) partial credit model favored the former model for this particular data set. Theoretical and practical aspects of the comparative application of multiple category models in the measurement of subjective well-being or mood are discussed.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,American Educational Research Association
Subject
