Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Avoidance Strategies by BIPA Students in Bahasa Indonesia Production as L3
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Avoidance Strategies by BIPA Students in Bahasa Indonesia Production as L3
Do you wish to request the book?
Avoidance Strategies by BIPA Students in Bahasa Indonesia Production as L3
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Avoidance Strategies by BIPA Students in Bahasa Indonesia Production as L3
2025
Overview
Background/purpose. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing the forms of language avoidance strategies employed by BIPA students. The results are expected to contribute to the development of language avoidance theory in language learning within a multilingual context. Methods. This study uses a qualitative approach to examine the avoidance strategies employed by BIPA students in BI production as an L3. The research participants consisted of six BIPA students from Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Data collection was conducted using elicitation techniques. Eliciting was conducted through casual conversation to elicit natural utterances. Data analysis was conducted in three stages: identification, classification, and interpretation. Results. Based on the research results, there are forms of language avoidance strategies in BI production as L3 in BIPA students, namely topic avoidance, message abandonment, and meaning replacement. These strategies are not entirely passive in the face of linguistic constraints. The use of language fillers has been identified as having a dual role: as a marker of linguistic unpreparedness and as a tool for regulating the conversational rhythm. Conclusion. Based on the results, BIPA students employ three main avoidance strategies in BI production as L3: topic avoidance, message abandonment, and meaning replacement, as a means of adapting to linguistic and non-linguistic limitations. These findings underscore the importance of explicitly teaching compensatory communication strategies in BIPA learning, including training in the effective use of language fillers, so that learners can manage linguistic limitations strategically, adaptively, and communicatively.
Publisher
ÜNİVERSİTEPARK Limited
