Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative Analysis of C2 and C4 Form Factors in Zirconium and Palladium Isotopes: Probing Nuclear Structure with Different Nuclear Potentials
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative Analysis of C2 and C4 Form Factors in Zirconium and Palladium Isotopes: Probing Nuclear Structure with Different Nuclear Potentials
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative Analysis of C2 and C4 Form Factors in Zirconium and Palladium Isotopes: Probing Nuclear Structure with Different Nuclear Potentials
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparative Analysis of C2 and C4 Form Factors in Zirconium and Palladium Isotopes: Probing Nuclear Structure with Different Nuclear Potentials
2025
Overview
The C2 and C4 longitudinal form factors for the first excited (21+) and (41+) states in the even-even Palladium isotopes ( 104 Pd, 106 Pd, 108 Pd, 110 Pd) and 90 Zr are compared in this work. We use three different nuclear potentials (Skyrme Sk35, Woods-Saxon (WS), and Harmonic Oscillator (HO)) in our theoretical calculations and compare them with real electron scattering data. The strengths and limits of each potential in explaining the observed form factors for quadrupole and hexadecapole transitions over a variety of nuclei are clarified by this comparison. Our research shows that the Skyrme Sk35 interaction, which suggests a more accurate description of the underlying transition density, often gives the most consistent agreement with experimental data, especially at greater momentum transfers. The observed discrepancies, particularly for C4 transitions and higher momentum transfers, highlight the difficulties in accurately modelling higher multipolarity excitations and point to the need for more sophisticated theoretical treatments that include effects other than simple mean-field descriptions, such as core polarization and meson exchange currents.
Publisher
IOP Publishing
