Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
On Bolzano's Alleged Explicativism
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
On Bolzano's Alleged Explicativism
Do you wish to request the book?
On Bolzano's Alleged Explicativism
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
On Bolzano's Alleged Explicativism
2006
Overview
Bolzano was the first to establish an explicit distinction between the deductive methods that allow us to recognise the certainty of a given truth and those that provide its objective ground. His conception of the relation between what we, in this paper, call \"subjective consequence\", i.e., the relation from epistemic reason to consequence and \"objective consequence\", i.e., grounding (Abfolge) however allows for an interpretation according to which Bolzano advocates an \"explicativist\" conception of proof: proofs par excellence are those that reflect the objective order of grounding. In this paper, we expose the problems involved by such a conception and argue in favour of a more rigorous demarcation between the ontological and the epistemological concern in the elaboration of a theory of demonstration.
Publisher
Springer,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
