Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Closest Substring Problems with Small Distances
by
Marx, Dániel
in
Algorithms
/ Approximation
/ Binding sites
/ Dimensional analysis
2008
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Closest Substring Problems with Small Distances
by
Marx, Dániel
in
Algorithms
/ Approximation
/ Binding sites
/ Dimensional analysis
2008
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Closest Substring Problems with Small Distances
2008
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
We study two pattern matching problems that are motivated by applications in computational biology. In the Closest Substring problem$k$strings$s_1,\\dots, s_k$are given, and the task is to find a string$s$of length$L$such that each string$s_i$has a consecutive substring of length$L$whose distance is at most$d$from$s$ . We present two algorithms that aim to be efficient for small fixed values of$d$and$k$ : for some functions$f$and$g$ , the algorithms have running time$f(d)\\cdot n^{O(\\log d)}$and$g(d,k)\\cdot n^{O(\\log\\log k)}$ , respectively. The second algorithm is based on connections with the extremal combinatorics of hypergraphs. The Closest Substring problem is also investigated from the parameterized complexity point of view. Answering an open question from [P. A. Evans, A. D. Smith, and H. T. Wareham, Theoret. Comput. Sci., 306 (2003), pp. 407-430, M. R. Fellows, J. Gramm, and R. Niedermeier, Combinatorica, 26 (2006), pp. 141-167, J. Gramm, J. Guo, and R. Niedermeier, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 2751, Springer, Berlin, 2003, pp. 195-209, J. Gramm, R. Niedermeier, and P. Rossmanith, Algorithmica, 37 (2003), pp. 25-42], we show that the problem is W[1]-hard even if both$d$and$k$are parameters. It follows as a consequence of this hardness result that our algorithms are optimal in the sense that the exponent of$n$in the running time cannot be improved to$o(\\log d)$or to$o(\\log \\log k)$(modulo some complexity-theoretic assumptions). Consensus Patterns is the variant of the problem where, instead of the requirement that each$s_i$has a substring that is of distance at most$d$from$s$ , we have to select the substrings in such a way that the average of these$k$distances is at most$\\delta$ . By giving an$f(\\delta)\\cdot n^9$time algorithm, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable. This answers an open question from [M. R. Fellows, J. Gramm, and R. Niedermeier, Combinatorica, 26 (2006), pp. 141-167].
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.