Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Humanitarianism and the UN sustainable developmental goals are insufficient: The case for a humanistic industrial-organizational psychology
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Humanitarianism and the UN sustainable developmental goals are insufficient: The case for a humanistic industrial-organizational psychology
Do you wish to request the book?
Humanitarianism and the UN sustainable developmental goals are insufficient: The case for a humanistic industrial-organizational psychology
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Humanitarianism and the UN sustainable developmental goals are insufficient: The case for a humanistic industrial-organizational psychology
2023
Overview
[...]because HWP is conceived of as merely “a new area of research and practice,” it does not require much change in the education and training of I-O psychologists. An expanded scientist–practitioner–humanist (SPH) values model for I-O psychology Why are there no emergent subfields of humanitarian clinical psychology, humanitarian medicine, humanitarian social work, or humanitarian educator? Because psychotherapy, medicine, social welfare, and teaching are intrinsically caring professions; the characterization would be redundant. Rarely have we asked normative questions such as “Is it the right thing to do?” That is why the S–P model is incomplete. [...]the model is biased insofar as—rather than being caring in nature, or even “value free” as many of us proudly proclaim—the practitioner portion is suffused by an economic/managerialist value system that largely determines what we do, how we do it, and how we evaluate what we’ve done. [...]topics like fairness, ethics, and morality were barely mentioned in our texts, classrooms, internship placements, or informal discussions with professors and mentors.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
