Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Rates of Complications and Readmissions: In-Patient vs Outpatient ORIF of Calcaneus Fractures
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Rates of Complications and Readmissions: In-Patient vs Outpatient ORIF of Calcaneus Fractures
Do you wish to request the book?
Rates of Complications and Readmissions: In-Patient vs Outpatient ORIF of Calcaneus Fractures
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Rates of Complications and Readmissions: In-Patient vs Outpatient ORIF of Calcaneus Fractures
2022
Overview
Category:
Hindfoot; Trauma
Introduction/Purpose:
Calcaneus fractures are common injuries to the hindfoot. The safety of in-patient versus outpatient treatment in patients with calcaneus fractures remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to assess differences in wound complications and readmissions in operative calcaneus fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in an in- patient versus outpatient setting.
Methods:
Patients undergoing ORIF for calcaneus fractures from 2012 to 2020 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 18 years and an operative calcaneus fracture treated with the sinus tarsi approach (STA). Exclusion criteria consisted of a minimum of three months follow-up, open calcaneal fractures or fracture dislocations, inpatients with polytrauma, and patients without a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. A total of 113 patients met inclusion criteria with 24 (21%) managed inpatient and 89 (79%) managed as outpatient. The primary outcomes were deep infection defined as return to the operating room for debridement with positive cultures and readmissions. Secondary outcomes included implant related pain and unplanned return to the operating room.
Results:
Inpatients had a higher percentage of ASA classification 3&4 patients (58.3% vs 29.2%, p=0.008). Outpatients had a longer delay in days between injury and definitive fixation (mean 8 (8.9 SD, 0-31 range) vs. 14 (12.4 SD, 0-91 range) days, p=0.009). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of deep infections (8.3% vs. 4.5%, p=.606), implant related pain (8.3% vs. 15.7%, p=.516), return to the operating room (16.7% vs. 15.7%, p=1.0) or readmissions (4.2% vs. 3.4%, p=1.0) between inpatient and outpatient groups including in binary logistic regression models (p>.3 for all). In our retrospective study of patients undergoing operative repair of isolated calcaneus fractures with STA, there was no increased risk of wound complications or readmissions when calcaneus fractures were treated in an outpatient setting.
Conclusion:
In our retrospective study of patients undergoing operative repair of isolated calcaneus fractures with STA, there was no increased risk of wound complications or readmissions when calcaneus fractures were treated in an outpatient setting.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Sage Publications Ltd,SAGE Publishing
Subject
