Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Computational fluid dynamics analysis to improve hydrostatic thrust bearings: number of pockets and shape configuration analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Computational fluid dynamics analysis to improve hydrostatic thrust bearings: number of pockets and shape configuration analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Computational fluid dynamics analysis to improve hydrostatic thrust bearings: number of pockets and shape configuration analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Computational fluid dynamics analysis to improve hydrostatic thrust bearings: number of pockets and shape configuration analysis
2025
Overview
Hydrostatic bearings are expected to attract significant attention in the coming years due to their wide use in engineering applications, such as high-speed machine tool spindles, fast-moving machinery, and precision grinding tools. However, there is still a need to better understand the flow behavior related to different pressure pocket patterns. The aim of this research is to investigate how the supplied pressure and the shape of the pocket affect the pressure distribution in hydrostatic bearings with rectangular pads. Using the 3D Navier–Stokes equations and the finite volume method in ANSYS-CFD-19 R3, different recess designs — specifically rectangular and circular recesses — were analyzed to determine their impact on static pressure. The results showed that conical-shaped recesses produced higher pressure values compared to non-conical shapes. This study focused on two main types of recess shapes: rectangular and circular.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer Nature B.V,SpringerOpen
Subject
