MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of N losses ( $NO_3^ - $ , N₂O, NO) from surface applied, injected or amended (DCD) pig slurry of an irrigated soil in a Mediterranean climate
Comparison of N losses ( $NO_3^ - $ , N₂O, NO) from surface applied, injected or amended (DCD) pig slurry of an irrigated soil in a Mediterranean climate
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of N losses ( $NO_3^ - $ , N₂O, NO) from surface applied, injected or amended (DCD) pig slurry of an irrigated soil in a Mediterranean climate
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of N losses ( $NO_3^ - $ , N₂O, NO) from surface applied, injected or amended (DCD) pig slurry of an irrigated soil in a Mediterranean climate
Comparison of N losses ( $NO_3^ - $ , N₂O, NO) from surface applied, injected or amended (DCD) pig slurry of an irrigated soil in a Mediterranean climate

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of N losses ( $NO_3^ - $ , N₂O, NO) from surface applied, injected or amended (DCD) pig slurry of an irrigated soil in a Mediterranean climate
Comparison of N losses ( $NO_3^ - $ , N₂O, NO) from surface applied, injected or amended (DCD) pig slurry of an irrigated soil in a Mediterranean climate
Journal Article

Comparison of N losses ( $NO_3^ - $ , N₂O, NO) from surface applied, injected or amended (DCD) pig slurry of an irrigated soil in a Mediterranean climate

2005
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Nitrous oxide (N₂O), nitric oxide (NO), denitrification losses and $NO_3^ - $ leaching from an irrigated sward were quantified under Mediterranean conditions. The effect of injected pig slurry (IPS) with and without the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) was evaluated and also compared with that of a surface pig slurry application (SPS) and a control treatment (Control) without fertiliser. After application, fluxes of NO and N₂O peaked from SPS (3.06 mg NO-N m⁻² d⁻¹ and 108 mg N₂O-N m⁻² d⁻¹) and IPS (3.50 mg NO-N m⁻² d⁻¹ and 105 mg N₂O-N m⁻² d⁻¹). However, when irrigation was applied, N₂O and NO emissions declined. The total N₂O and denitrification losses were slightly large from IPS than from SPS, although the differences were not significant (P < 0.05). Emission of NO was not affected by the method of pig slurry application. DCD inhibited nitrification during the first 20-30 days and reduced N₂O and NO emissions from pig slurry by at least 46% and 37%, respectively. Considering the 215 days following pig slurry application, the emission factor of N₂O based on N fertiliser was 1.60% (SPS), 2.95% (IPS), and 0.50% (IPS + DCD). The emission factor for NO was 0.14% (SPS), 0.12% (IPS), and 0.02% (IPS + DCD). Environmental conditions of the crop favoured the denitrification process as the most important source of N₂O during the experimental period. The differences in the denitrification rate between treatments could be explained by the pattern of water soluble carbon (WSC), that was the highest value in injected pig slurry (with and without DCD). Due to low drainage (5% of water applied), leaching losses of $NO_3^ - $ were lower than those of denitrification from the upper soil layer (0-10 cm) in all treatments and especially with IPS + DCD, where the nitrification inhibitor was very efficient in reducing leaching losses.