Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing single-port and four-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a single-center experience
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing single-port and four-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a single-center experience
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing single-port and four-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a single-center experience
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparative outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing single-port and four-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a single-center experience
2025
Overview
We aimed to compare the outcomes and postoperative complications of patients with esophageal cancer after single-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy (SPTE) and four-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy (FPTE). We retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from February 2019 to November 2022. In total, 86 patients were included in the SPTE group and 114 patients were included in the FPTE group. Compared to patients undergoing FPTE, significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (13.54 ± 3.88 vs. 19.08 ± 5.09 days), shorter chest drainage time (6.06 ± 2.16 vs. 7.45 ± 1.68 days), lower estimated intraoperative blood loss (226.05 ± 94.87 vs. 363.16 ± 78.92 mL), and longer overall length of surgery (346.34 ± 53.86 vs. 332.89 ± 28.86 min) and longer length of abdominal surgery (183.46 ± 33.33 vs. 166.05 ± 22.07 min) were observed among patients undergoing SPTE; however, no significant difference was observed regarding 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month overall survival, time to start oral feeding, and length of thoracic surgery. Furthermore, postoperative intractable pain lasting for 3 months (39.5% vs. 21.0%), pneumonia (34.2% vs. 11.6%), empyema (14.9% vs. 3.5%), and chylothorax (10.5% vs. 2.3%) were significantly more frequent in the FPTE group, whereas postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms (41.9% vs. 23.7%) were significantly more frequent in the SPTE group. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding postoperative arrhythmia, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, esophagotracheal fistula, second surgery, and intractable pain lasting for 6 and 12 months. Compared to FPTE, SPTE may improve patients’ outcomes and prevent some of the major complications.
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.