Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Finding Common Climate Action Among Contested Worldviews: Stakeholder-Informed Approaches in Austria
by
Werdenigg, Andrea
, Katzmair, Harald
, Gulas, Christian
, Skouge, Chase
, Cambardella, Claire
, Fath, Brian D.
in
Analysis
/ Climate action
/ Climate change
/ Climate policy
/ Climate science
/ Climatic changes
/ Environmental aspects
/ Environmental policy
/ Impact analysis
/ Laws, regulations and rules
/ Rationality
/ Social life & customs
/ Social network analysis
/ Social networks
/ Stakeholder theory
/ Tax reform
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Finding Common Climate Action Among Contested Worldviews: Stakeholder-Informed Approaches in Austria
by
Werdenigg, Andrea
, Katzmair, Harald
, Gulas, Christian
, Skouge, Chase
, Cambardella, Claire
, Fath, Brian D.
in
Analysis
/ Climate action
/ Climate change
/ Climate policy
/ Climate science
/ Climatic changes
/ Environmental aspects
/ Environmental policy
/ Impact analysis
/ Laws, regulations and rules
/ Rationality
/ Social life & customs
/ Social network analysis
/ Social networks
/ Stakeholder theory
/ Tax reform
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Finding Common Climate Action Among Contested Worldviews: Stakeholder-Informed Approaches in Austria
by
Werdenigg, Andrea
, Katzmair, Harald
, Gulas, Christian
, Skouge, Chase
, Cambardella, Claire
, Fath, Brian D.
in
Analysis
/ Climate action
/ Climate change
/ Climate policy
/ Climate science
/ Climatic changes
/ Environmental aspects
/ Environmental policy
/ Impact analysis
/ Laws, regulations and rules
/ Rationality
/ Social life & customs
/ Social network analysis
/ Social networks
/ Stakeholder theory
/ Tax reform
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Finding Common Climate Action Among Contested Worldviews: Stakeholder-Informed Approaches in Austria
Journal Article
Finding Common Climate Action Among Contested Worldviews: Stakeholder-Informed Approaches in Austria
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Our goal was to identify and understand perspectives of different stakeholders in the field of climate policy and test a process of co-creative policy development to support the implementation of climate protection measures. As the severity of climate change grows globally, perceptions of climate science and climate-based policy have become increasingly polarized. The one-solution consensus or compromise that has encapsulated environmental policymaking has proven insufficient or unable to address accurately or efficiently the climate issue. Because climate change is often described as a wicked problem (multiple causes, widespread impacts, uncertain outcomes, and an array of potential solutions), a clumsy solution that incorporates ideas and actions representative of varied and divergent worldviews is best suited to address it. This study used the Theory of Plural Rationality, which uses a two-dimensional spectrum to identify four interdependent worldviews as well as a fifth autonomous perspective to define the differing perspectives in the field of climate policy in Austria. Stakeholder inputs regarding general worldviews, climate change, and climate policy were evaluated to identify agreeable actions representative of the multiple perspectives. Thus, we developed and tested a co-creative process for developing clumsy solutions. This study concludes that while an ideological consensus is unlikely, agreement is more likely to occur on the practical level of concrete actions (albeit perhaps for different reasons). Findings suggested that creating an ecological tax reform was an acceptable policy action to diverse stakeholders. Furthermore, the study illuminated that the government is perceived to have the most potential influence on climate protection policy and acts as a key “broker”, or linkage, between other approaches that are perceived to be more actualized but less impactful.
Publisher
MDPI AG
Subject
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.