Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Keep the chickens cooped: the epistemic inadequacy of free range metaphysics
by
Bryant, Amanda
in
Education
/ Epistemology
/ Logic
/ Metaphysics
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Language
/ Philosophy of Science
/ Pragmatics
/ S.I.: New Metaphysics of Science
/ Science
/ Simplification
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Keep the chickens cooped: the epistemic inadequacy of free range metaphysics
by
Bryant, Amanda
in
Education
/ Epistemology
/ Logic
/ Metaphysics
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Language
/ Philosophy of Science
/ Pragmatics
/ S.I.: New Metaphysics of Science
/ Science
/ Simplification
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Keep the chickens cooped: the epistemic inadequacy of free range metaphysics
Journal Article
Keep the chickens cooped: the epistemic inadequacy of free range metaphysics
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
This paper aims to better motivate the naturalization of metaphysics by identifying and criticizing a class of theories I call ’free range metaphysics’. I argue that free range metaphysics is epistemically inadequate because the constraints on its content—consistency, simplicity, intuitive plausibility, and explanatory power—are insufficiently robust and justificatory. However, since free range metaphysics yields clarity-conducive techniques, incubates science, and produces conceptual and formal tools useful for scientifically engaged philosophy, I do not recommend its discontinuation. I do recommend, however, ending the discipline’s bad faith. That is, I urge that free range metaphysics not be taken to have fully satisfactory epistemic credentials over and above its pragmatic ones.
Publisher
Springer Netherlands,Springer Nature B.V
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.