Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Dicent Symbols in Non-Human Semiotic Processes
by
Queiroz, João
in
Artificial Intelligence
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Chlorocebus
/ Cognitive ability
/ Evolutionary Biology
/ Life Sciences
/ Linguistics
/ Monkeys & apes
/ Original Paper
/ Philosophy of Science
/ Psychology
/ Semiotics
/ Typology
2012
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Dicent Symbols in Non-Human Semiotic Processes
by
Queiroz, João
in
Artificial Intelligence
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Chlorocebus
/ Cognitive ability
/ Evolutionary Biology
/ Life Sciences
/ Linguistics
/ Monkeys & apes
/ Original Paper
/ Philosophy of Science
/ Psychology
/ Semiotics
/ Typology
2012
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Dicent Symbols in Non-Human Semiotic Processes
by
Queiroz, João
in
Artificial Intelligence
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Chlorocebus
/ Cognitive ability
/ Evolutionary Biology
/ Life Sciences
/ Linguistics
/ Monkeys & apes
/ Original Paper
/ Philosophy of Science
/ Psychology
/ Semiotics
/ Typology
2012
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Dicent Symbols in Non-Human Semiotic Processes
2012
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Against the view that symbol-based semiosis is a human cognitive uniqueness, we have argued that non-human primates such as African vervet monkeys possess symbolic competence, as formally defined by Charles S. Peirce. Here I develop this argument by showing that the equivocal role ascribed to symbols by “folk semiotics” stems from an incomplete application of the Peircean logical framework for the classification of signs, which describes three kinds of symbols: rheme, dicent and argument. In an attempt to advance in the classifying semiotic processes, Peirce proposed several typologies, with different degrees of refinement. Around 1903, he developed a division into ten classes. According to this typology, symbols can be further analysed in three subclasses (rheme, dicent, argument). I proceed to demonstrate that vervet monkeys employ dicent symbols. There are remarkable implications of this argument since ‘symbolic species theory’ fails to explore the vast Peircean semiotic philosophy to frame questions regarding the emergence and evolution of symbolic processes.
Publisher
Springer Netherlands,Springer Nature B.V
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.