MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Residual Diagnostic Methods for Bell-Type Count Models
Residual Diagnostic Methods for Bell-Type Count Models
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Residual Diagnostic Methods for Bell-Type Count Models
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Residual Diagnostic Methods for Bell-Type Count Models
Residual Diagnostic Methods for Bell-Type Count Models

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Residual Diagnostic Methods for Bell-Type Count Models
Residual Diagnostic Methods for Bell-Type Count Models
Journal Article

Residual Diagnostic Methods for Bell-Type Count Models

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Count datasets represented as integers are commonly encountered in various scientific fields, encompassing scenarios such as the number of species in a habitat, the number of accidents at a junction, the number of infected cells. This type of data often entails the presence of zero counts, which can be notably prevalent within the dataset. Recently, the zero-inflated Bell distribution family has been introduced to address the substantial occurrence of zeros in count datasets. Model diagnosis is a crucial step to ensure the appropriateness of a fitted model for the given data. While Pearson and deviance residuals are commonly employed for diagnosing count models in practical applications, it is widely acknowledged that these residuals do not adhere to normality when applied to count data. In the present study, our focus lies in evaluating the effectiveness of conventional diagnostic tools, including Pearson and deviance residuals, as well as randomized quantile residuals (RQRs) for the novel Bell and zero-inflated Bell models, which have been proposed as solutions to address overdispersion and zero inflation, respectively. Through this investigation, we aim to shed light on the performance of these residuals in the context of these newly proposed models. In the simulation study, the normality of randomized quantile residuals based on the Shapiro-Wilk test’s p-values are investigated for detecting overdispersion and zero inflation for the Bell-type regression models. The findings of this study indicate the superiority of RQRs in detecting distributional assumptions and reveal that RQRs possess the capability to detect overdispersion and zero inflation under Bell-type models. The number of infected blood cells is used in the application part of the study to illustrate the residual diagnostics of Bell-type regression models. Poisson, Bell, negative binomial, and their zero-inflated versions are utilized to analyze the infected blood cells dataset. Model fit criteria are employed to compare the analysis results of these count models, both in terms of goodness of fit and residual diagnostics.