Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Guile and The Guise: Apropos of Comparative Law as We Know It
by
Legrand, Pierre
in
Comparative analysis
/ Comparative law
/ Comparative studies
/ Constitutional law
/ Critical theory
/ Distortion
/ Economic activity
/ Epistemology
/ Law
/ Morality
/ Rule of law
/ Universalism
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The Guile and The Guise: Apropos of Comparative Law as We Know It
by
Legrand, Pierre
in
Comparative analysis
/ Comparative law
/ Comparative studies
/ Constitutional law
/ Critical theory
/ Distortion
/ Economic activity
/ Epistemology
/ Law
/ Morality
/ Rule of law
/ Universalism
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The Guile and The Guise: Apropos of Comparative Law as We Know It
Journal Article
The Guile and The Guise: Apropos of Comparative Law as We Know It
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The field of comparative law prioritizes the ascertainment of universals or commonalities across laws, two chimerical pursuits. In the process, comparative research abides significant distortion of information, not always in good faith, and a correlative loss of intellectual warrant. This article urges acknowledgment of such serious epistemic deficit, of its detrimental impact on comparative law, and of the need to restore intellectual integrity to comparative research in law through a radically different approach to foreignness.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.