Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Air sampling and analysis method to determine worker exposure levels to N -isopropyl- N ′-phenyl- p -phenylenediamine
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Air sampling and analysis method to determine worker exposure levels to N -isopropyl- N ′-phenyl- p -phenylenediamine
Do you wish to request the book?
Air sampling and analysis method to determine worker exposure levels to N -isopropyl- N ′-phenyl- p -phenylenediamine
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Air sampling and analysis method to determine worker exposure levels to N -isopropyl- N ′-phenyl- p -phenylenediamine
2025
Overview
Objectives: This study aimed to develop a method for determining workers’ exposure concentrations to airborne N-isopropyl-N′-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (IPPD). Methods: A hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (HPB PTFE) membrane filter was used as the sampling medium. IPPD was extracted from the HPB PTFE filter with acetonitrile, and its concentration in the extracted solution was determined using a high-performance liquid chromatograph equipped with a photodiode array detector. The validating method was performed using the following parameters: extraction and retention efficiency, storage stability, method quantitation limit, and reproducibility. Results: The IPPD extraction efficiency from the spiked HPB PTFE filters was 96%-100%. The IPPD retention efficiencies on the HPB PTFE filters were 72%-99%, with relative standard deviations indicating the overall reproducibility of 0.9%-3.1%. IPPD on the HPB PTFE filter remained stable for at least 7 days at 4°C. The method quantitation limit was 12.5 μg/sample. Conclusions: We successfully developed a method to measure workers’ exposure to airborne IPPD within the concentration range of 0.05-4 mg/m3, which will assist risk assessments.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
