Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Manifest Invalidity: Neil Tennant's New Argument for Intuitionism
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Manifest Invalidity: Neil Tennant's New Argument for Intuitionism
Do you wish to request the book?
Manifest Invalidity: Neil Tennant's New Argument for Intuitionism
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Manifest Invalidity: Neil Tennant's New Argument for Intuitionism
2003
Overview
In Chapter 7 of \"The Taming of the True\", Neil Tennant provides a new argument from Michael Dummett's \"manifestation requirement\" to the incorrectness of classical logic and the correctness of intuitionistic logic. I show that Tennant's new argument is only valid if one interprets crucial existence claims occurring in the proof in the manner of intuitionists. If one interprets the existence claims as a classical logician would, then one can accept Tennant's premises while rejecting his conclusion of logical revision. Thus, Tennant has provided no evidence that should convince anyone who is not already an intuitionist. Since his proof is a proof for the correctness of intuitionism, it begs the question.
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
