Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
WRITING SKILLS, KNOWLEDGE, MOTIVATION, AND STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR PREDICT STUDENTS’ PERSUASIVE WRITING PERFORMANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF ROBUST WRITING INSTRUCTION
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
WRITING SKILLS, KNOWLEDGE, MOTIVATION, AND STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR PREDICT STUDENTS’ PERSUASIVE WRITING PERFORMANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF ROBUST WRITING INSTRUCTION
Do you wish to request the book?
WRITING SKILLS, KNOWLEDGE, MOTIVATION, AND STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR PREDICT STUDENTS’ PERSUASIVE WRITING PERFORMANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF ROBUST WRITING INSTRUCTION
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
WRITING SKILLS, KNOWLEDGE, MOTIVATION, AND STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR PREDICT STUDENTS’ PERSUASIVE WRITING PERFORMANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF ROBUST WRITING INSTRUCTION
2019
Overview
This study tested whether writing skills, knowledge, motivation, and strategic behaviors (within the context of robust writing instruction) each made a statistically unique contribution to predicting fifth-grade students’ (123 girls, 104 boys) composition quality and length on a persuasive writing task involving source material, after variance due to other predictors and control variables (reading comprehension, gender, class, and school effects) were controlled. With one exception, writing skills, knowledge, motivation, and strategic behaviors each accounted for statistically unique variance in predicting compositional quality. The exception involved writing knowledge, which did notmake a unique contribution in the fall but did in the spring, when a topic knowledge measure was added. In addition, writing motivation, and strategic behaviors accounted for unique variance in composition length in the fall, and writing knowledge did so in the spring.
Publisher
University of Chicago Press,The University of Chicago Press,University of Chicago, acting through its Press
