Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Reflections on Economic Interpretation, Slavery, the People Out of Doors, and Top Down versus Bottom Up
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Reflections on Economic Interpretation, Slavery, the People Out of Doors, and Top Down versus Bottom Up
Do you wish to request the book?
Reflections on Economic Interpretation, Slavery, the People Out of Doors, and Top Down versus Bottom Up
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Reflections on Economic Interpretation, Slavery, the People Out of Doors, and Top Down versus Bottom Up
2011
Overview
Staughton Lynd and David Waldstreicher attempt to cut across old divisions in the historiography of the American Revolution between whigs and progressives (or neo-whigs and neo-progressives) to argue that the Revolution was a colonial independence movement and the reasons for it were fundamentally economic. Robert G. Parkinson, Jack Rakove, Barbara Clark Smith, and Michael A. McDonnell respond to the essay; the Forum concludes with Lynd and Waldstreicher’s reply.
Publisher
The Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture,Institute of Early American History and Culture
