Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of Backbones for Semantic Segmentation Network
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of Backbones for Semantic Segmentation Network
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of Backbones for Semantic Segmentation Network
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparison of Backbones for Semantic Segmentation Network
2020
Overview
As for the classification network that is constantly emerging with each passing day, different classification network as the backbone of the semantic segmentation network may show different performance. This paper selected the road extraction data set of CVPR DeepGlobe, and compared the performance differences of VGG-16 as the backbone of Unet, ResNet34, ResNet101 and Xception as the backbone of AD-LinkNet. When VGG-16 is used as the backbone of the semantic segmentation network, it performs better in the face of long and wide road extraction. As the backbone of the semantic segmentation network, ResNet has a higher ability to extract small roads. When Xception is used as the backbone of the semantic segmentation network, it not only retains the characteristics of ResNet34, but also can effectively deal with the complex situation of extracting target covered by occlusions.
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Subject
