Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Biomechanical Characterization of Human Amniotic Membrane Preparations for Ocular Surface Reconstruction
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Biomechanical Characterization of Human Amniotic Membrane Preparations for Ocular Surface Reconstruction
Do you wish to request the book?
Biomechanical Characterization of Human Amniotic Membrane Preparations for Ocular Surface Reconstruction
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Biomechanical Characterization of Human Amniotic Membrane Preparations for Ocular Surface Reconstruction
2004
Overview
Purpose: To investigate the tensile and elastic properties of both commercially available and experimental human amniotic membrane preparations. Method: Nine preparations of human amniotic membrane were studied. The four dry preparations were untreated (nonirradiated, n = 20), and gamma (n = 25), low-dose (AmbioDry ® , Okto Ophtho Inc., Costa Mesa, Calif., USA, n = 20) and high-dose (n = 20) electron beam sterilized. The same dry membranes were moistened with balanced salt solution (n = 20, 34, 20 and 20, respectively). The ninth group consisted of thawed medium-frozen amniotic membrane (AmnioGraft ® , Bio-Tissue Inc., Miami, Fla., USA, n = 20). The membranes were cut into thin strips, loaded on a gram range load sensor, and stretched incrementally to the point of rupture. The modulus of elasticity, displacement until rupture and maximum tolerated stress were recorded and compared. Results: The dry preparations exhibited higher moduli of elasticity when compared with the moist samples, with the low-dose electron beam-irradiated samples having the greatest mean modulus of elasticity overall and maintaining a high modulus of elasticity as a moist sample (p < 0.05). Moist nonirradiated preparations and thawed medium-frozen preparations stretched the farthest before rupture and experienced the greatest mean stresses at the point of rupture. While 3 of 4 membranes had greater stretch when moistened as compared to their dry counterparts, there was no difference in the membrane stiffness between dry and moistened low-dose electron beam-irradiated samples (p > 0.8). Conclusions: Low-dose electron beam-irradiated amnion appeared to maintain desirable elastic characteristics in transition from a dry to rehydrated state and may thus provide an easy-to-manipulate transplant tissue for ocular surface reconstruction. Moist nonirradiated and thawed medium-frozen tissues, however, may provide surgical advantages as they required greater forces to rupture.
Publisher
S. Karger AG
