Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Phronesis and the Knowledge-Action Gap in Moral Psychology and Moral Education
by
Paris, Panos
, Darnell, Catherine
, Kristjánsson, Kristján
, Gulliford, Liz
in
Original Paper
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Phronesis and the Knowledge-Action Gap in Moral Psychology and Moral Education
by
Paris, Panos
, Darnell, Catherine
, Kristjánsson, Kristján
, Gulliford, Liz
in
Original Paper
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Phronesis and the Knowledge-Action Gap in Moral Psychology and Moral Education
Journal Article
Phronesis and the Knowledge-Action Gap in Moral Psychology and Moral Education
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
This article has two aims. First, to offer a critical review of the literatures on two wellknown single-component solutions to the problem of a gap between moral knowledge and moral action: moral identity and moral emotions. Second, to take seriously the rising interest in Aristotle-inspired virtue ethics and character development within the social sciences: approaches that seem to assume that the development of phronesis (practical wisdom) bridges the gap in question. Since phronesis is a multicomponent construct, the latter part of this article offers an overview of what those different components would be, as a necessary precursor to operationalising them if the phronesis hypothesis were to be subjected to empirical scrutiny. The idea of a neo-Aristotelian multicomponent solution to the “gappiness problem” invites comparisons with another multicomponent candidate, the neo-Kohlbergian four-component model, with which it shares at least surface similarities. Some space is thus devoted to the proposed theoretical uniqueness of a phronesis-based multicomponent model vis-à-vis the neo-Kohlbergian one. Our main conclusion is that – weaknesses in its developmental psychological grounding notwithstanding – operationalising the phronesis model for the purposes of instrument design and empirical inquiry would be a feasible and potentially productive enterprise.
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.