Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Turtle epistemology
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Turtle epistemology
Do you wish to request the book?
Turtle epistemology
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Turtle epistemology
2014
Overview
In \"Justification Without Awareness\", Michael Bergmann divides internalist epistemologies into those with a strong awareness requirement and those with a weak awareness requirement; he presents a dilemma, hoisting the \"strongs\" on one horn, and the \"weaks\" on the other. Here I reply on behalf of the strongawareness view, presenting what I take to be a more satisfactory, and more fundamental, reply to Bergmann than I believe has been offered by his other critics, and in particular by Rogers and Matheson in their \"Bergmann's dilemma: exit strategies for internalists,\" with which I am in partial agreement.
Publisher
Springer,Springer Netherlands,Springer Nature B.V
