MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks
A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks
A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks
A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks
Journal Article

A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The accurate prediction of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) in rock samples is critical for the successful planning, design, and implementation of mining and civil engineering projects. UCS is crucial in assessing the stability and durability of rock masses, which directly influences the safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of construction and excavation operations. Here’s a refined version of your text for enhanced clarity and flow: in this part, the execution of the proposed model was compared for both single and hybrid configurations. Hybrid models included support vector regression (SVR) combined with the Seahorse Optimizer (SVSH) and SVR combined with the COOT optimization algorithm (SVCO). For training, 70% of the UCS dataset was utilized, while the remaining 30% was equally divided between testing (15%) and validation (15%). For the model evaluation, several metrics were considered in this work, including the R 2 , RMSE, WAPE, MAE, and RAE, which ensure fairness in the analysis. The closer the R 2 value comes to 1, the better the performance. The error metrics should be close to 0 for better accuracy. From Table 2, one can observe that the result of the standalone SVR model gave an RMSE of 6.213 during training and 9.454 during testing, hence showing poor performance. However, the inclusion of optimization algorithms significantly improved the performance of the SVR framework. Among the hybrid models, the SVSH model had the best performance, with an R 2 value of 0.998 and an RMSE of 1.261 during training. The SVCO model performed moderately, with an R 2 value of 0.988 during training.