Journal Article

The Case Against Military Commissions

Koh, Harold Hongju

2002

Overview

In January 2002, Zacarias Moussaoui, a French national of Moroccan descent, pleaded not guilty in Virginia federal court to six counts of conspiring to commit acts of international terrorism in connection with the September 11 attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. In other times, it would have seemed unremarkable for someone charged with conspiring to murder American citizens and destroy American property on American soil to be tried in a U.S. civilian court. More than two centuries ago, Article I, Section 8, Clause 10 of the United States Constitution granted Congress the power to \"define and punish Piracies, Felonies committed on the High Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations,\" a power that Congress immediately exercised by criminalizing piracy, the eighteenth-century version of modern terrorism. Since then, Congress has criminalized numerous other international offenses. In recent decades, United States courts have decided criminal cases convicting international hijackers, terrorists, and drug smugglers, as well as a string of well-publicized civil lawsuits adjudicating gross human rights violations. Most pertinent, federal prosecutors have successfully tried and convicted in U.S. courts numerous members of Al Qaeda, the very terrorist group charged with planning the September 11 attacks, for earlier attacks on the World Trade Center and the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya.

• Publisher: Cambridge University Press,American Society of International Law
• Subject: Agora: Military Commissions / Criminal justice / Human rights / International law / International security / Law / Military / Military defense / Military tribunals / Prosecuting attorneys / Rule of law / September 11 terrorist attacks-2001 / Terrorism / Terrorists / Trials / Tribunals / Tribunals & commissions