Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Do lump-sum investing strategies really outperform dollar-cost averaging strategies?
by
Lu, Richard
, Hoang, Vu Tran
, Wong, Wing-Keung
in
Asset allocation
/ Assets
/ Consumers
/ Customers
/ Economic conditions
/ Economic performance
/ High risk
/ Investment advisors
/ Investment policy
/ Investments
/ Investors
/ Kurtosis
/ Long term
/ Lump sum
/ Markets
/ Monte Carlo simulation
/ Prices
/ Simulation
/ Standard deviation
/ Stock exchanges
/ Trading
/ Writers
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Do lump-sum investing strategies really outperform dollar-cost averaging strategies?
by
Lu, Richard
, Hoang, Vu Tran
, Wong, Wing-Keung
in
Asset allocation
/ Assets
/ Consumers
/ Customers
/ Economic conditions
/ Economic performance
/ High risk
/ Investment advisors
/ Investment policy
/ Investments
/ Investors
/ Kurtosis
/ Long term
/ Lump sum
/ Markets
/ Monte Carlo simulation
/ Prices
/ Simulation
/ Standard deviation
/ Stock exchanges
/ Trading
/ Writers
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Do lump-sum investing strategies really outperform dollar-cost averaging strategies?
by
Lu, Richard
, Hoang, Vu Tran
, Wong, Wing-Keung
in
Asset allocation
/ Assets
/ Consumers
/ Customers
/ Economic conditions
/ Economic performance
/ High risk
/ Investment advisors
/ Investment policy
/ Investments
/ Investors
/ Kurtosis
/ Long term
/ Lump sum
/ Markets
/ Monte Carlo simulation
/ Prices
/ Simulation
/ Standard deviation
/ Stock exchanges
/ Trading
/ Writers
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Do lump-sum investing strategies really outperform dollar-cost averaging strategies?
Journal Article
Do lump-sum investing strategies really outperform dollar-cost averaging strategies?
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose
The literature has demonstrated that lump-sum (LS) outperforms dollar-cost averaging (DCA) in uptrend markets while DCA outperforms LS only when the asset price is mean-reverted or downtrend. To bridge the gap in the literature, this study aims to use both Sharpe ratio (SR) and economic performance measure (EPM) to compare the performance of DCA and LS under both accumulative and disaccumulative approaches when the asset price is simulated to be uptrend.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses both disaccumulative and accumulative approaches to compare DCA with LS and uses both SR and EPM to evaluate their performance when the asset price is simulated to be uptrend. Instead of using the annualized returns that are commonly used by other DCA studies, we compute the holding-period returns in the comparison in this paper.
Findings
The simulation shows that no matter which approach is used, DCA outperforms LS in nearly all the cases in the less uptrend markets while DCA still performs better than LS in many cases of the uptrend markets, especially when the market is more volatile and investment horizon is long, regardless which approach the authors used. The authors also find more evidence supporting DCA over LS by using EPM, which is more suitable in the analysis because the returns generated by DCA are positive skewed and flat-tailed that are ignored when SR is used.
Research limitations/implications
The authors conclude that DCA is a better trading strategy than LS for investment even in the uptrend market, especially on high risky assets.
Practical implications
Investors could consider choosing DCA instead of LS as their trading strategy, especially when they prefer long term investment and investing in high-risk assets.
Social implications
Fund managers could consider recommending DCA to their customers, especially when they prefer long term investment and investing in high-risk assets.
Originality/value
This is the own study and, as far as the authors know, this is the first study in the literature uses both SR and EPM to compare the performance of DCA and LS under both accumulative and disaccumulative approaches when the asset price is simulated to be uptrend.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.