Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Corporate social responsibility as a defense against knowledge spillovers
by
Kacperczyk, Aleksandra
, Flammer, Caroline
in
Business
/ Companies
/ Competition
/ Competitiveness
/ Corporate responsibility
/ corporate social responsibility
/ difference‐in‐differences
/ Disclosure
/ Economic models
/ Employees
/ Employers
/ Experiments
/ inevitable disclosure doctrine
/ Innovations
/ Knowledge
/ knowledge spillovers
/ Laboratories
/ Polls & surveys
/ Propensity
/ RESEARCH ARTICLE
/ Research design
/ Responses
/ Social responsibility
/ States
/ Threats
/ trade secrets
/ Workers
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Corporate social responsibility as a defense against knowledge spillovers
by
Kacperczyk, Aleksandra
, Flammer, Caroline
in
Business
/ Companies
/ Competition
/ Competitiveness
/ Corporate responsibility
/ corporate social responsibility
/ difference‐in‐differences
/ Disclosure
/ Economic models
/ Employees
/ Employers
/ Experiments
/ inevitable disclosure doctrine
/ Innovations
/ Knowledge
/ knowledge spillovers
/ Laboratories
/ Polls & surveys
/ Propensity
/ RESEARCH ARTICLE
/ Research design
/ Responses
/ Social responsibility
/ States
/ Threats
/ trade secrets
/ Workers
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Corporate social responsibility as a defense against knowledge spillovers
by
Kacperczyk, Aleksandra
, Flammer, Caroline
in
Business
/ Companies
/ Competition
/ Competitiveness
/ Corporate responsibility
/ corporate social responsibility
/ difference‐in‐differences
/ Disclosure
/ Economic models
/ Employees
/ Employers
/ Experiments
/ inevitable disclosure doctrine
/ Innovations
/ Knowledge
/ knowledge spillovers
/ Laboratories
/ Polls & surveys
/ Propensity
/ RESEARCH ARTICLE
/ Research design
/ Responses
/ Social responsibility
/ States
/ Threats
/ trade secrets
/ Workers
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Corporate social responsibility as a defense against knowledge spillovers
Journal Article
Corporate social responsibility as a defense against knowledge spillovers
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Research Summary We examine whether companies respond to the threat of knowledge leakage by strategically increasing their engagement in corporate social responsibility (CSR). To obtain exogenous variation in the threat of knowledge leakage, we exploit a natural experiment provided by the rejection of the inevitable disclosure doctrine (IDD) by several U.S. states. Using a difference‐in‐differences methodology we find that, following the rejection of the IDD, companies significantly increase their CSR. Our proposed rationale is that CSR helps mitigate knowledge leakage by (i) reducing employees' propensity to join a rival firm, and (ii) reducing employees' propensity to disclose the firm's valuable knowledge even if they join a rival firm. Evidence from a laboratory experiment, an online experiment, and a survey of knowledge workers is supportive of these arguments. Managerial Summary We study the role of CSR in companies' response to the threat of knowledge leakage—a major managerial challenge that has important implications for firms' innovation and competitiveness. We use three different research designs (an analysis of companies' CSR policies in response to an increased threat of knowledge leakage; a survey of knowledge workers; and an experiment conducted both online and in a laboratory setting). The results show that CSR is perceived to mitigate the threat of knowledge leakage. In particular, (i) CSR reduces knowledge workers' propensity to join rival firms (i.e., they are less likely to “walk”) and, even if they do, (ii) CSR reduces their propensity to disclose the firm's valuable knowledge to their new employer (i.e., they are less likely to “talk”).
Publisher
Wiley,John Wiley & Sons, Ltd,Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.