Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Application of NEXRAD precipitation data for assessing the implications of low development practices in an ungauged basin
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Application of NEXRAD precipitation data for assessing the implications of low development practices in an ungauged basin
Do you wish to request the book?
Application of NEXRAD precipitation data for assessing the implications of low development practices in an ungauged basin
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Application of NEXRAD precipitation data for assessing the implications of low development practices in an ungauged basin
2023
Overview
Hydrologic analysis in watersheds lacking rain gauge stations has been a challenge and even those with stations that do not contain the required amount of data create problems in model verification. So, the study integrates the Next Generation Weather RadarIII precipitation data and the Personal Computer Storm Water Management Model (PCSWMM) for evaluating the model's effectiveness. The study further integrates 100‐year return period precipitation intensity and PCSWMM to generate a one‐dimensional flood risk zone map, which shows the major sub‐catchments under risk zones. Based on the identification of risk zones from PCSWMM, three different low‐impact developments (LIDs), street plants, infiltration trenches, and green roofs are applied independently and uniformly to compare the decrease in flow. Thereafter, the prioritized list of critical sub‐catchments from hydraulic modeling is compared with the compromise programming method, an approach for studying the decrement in flow by increasing LID application (infiltration trench) in the first five critical sub‐catchments, suggesting planners and researchers identify the most critical sub‐catchments and develop future potential strategies.
