Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparisons of Wave Force Model Effects on the Structural Responses and Fatigue Loads of a Semi-Submersible Floating Wind Turbine
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparisons of Wave Force Model Effects on the Structural Responses and Fatigue Loads of a Semi-Submersible Floating Wind Turbine
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparisons of Wave Force Model Effects on the Structural Responses and Fatigue Loads of a Semi-Submersible Floating Wind Turbine
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparisons of Wave Force Model Effects on the Structural Responses and Fatigue Loads of a Semi-Submersible Floating Wind Turbine
2024
Overview
The selection of wave force models will significantly impact the structural responses of floating wind turbines. In this study, comparisons of wave force model effects on the structural responses and fatigue loads of a semi-submersible floating wind turbine (SFWT) were conducted. Simulations were performed by employing the Morison equation (ME) with linear or second-order wave kinematics and potential flow theory (PFT) with first- or second-order wave forces. A comparison of regular waves, irregular waves, and coupled wind/waves analyses with the experimental data showed that many of the simulation results and experimental data are relatively consistent. However, notable discrepancies are found in the response amplitude operators for platform heave, tower base bending moment, and tension in mooring lines. PFT models give more satisfactory results of heave but more significant discrepancies in tower base bending moment than the ME models. In irregular wave analyses, low-frequency resonances were captured by PFT models with second-order difference-frequency terms, and high-frequency resonances were captured by the ME models or PFT models with second-order sum-frequency terms. These force models capture the response frequencies but do not reasonably predict the response amplitudes. The coupled wind/waves analyses showed more satisfactory results than the wave-only analyses. However, an important detail to note is that this satisfactory result is based on the overprediction of wind-induced responses.
Publisher
Science Press,Springer Nature B.V,School of Civil Engineering,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China%School of Hydraulic Engineering,Ludong University,Yantai 264025,China,State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China,Shandong Marine Aerospace Equipment Technological Innovation Center,Yantai 264004,China%State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China,School of Hydraulic Engineering,Ludong University,Yantai 264025,China
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.