Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
In vitro assessment of farnesoid X receptor antagonism to predict drug-induced liver injury risk
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
In vitro assessment of farnesoid X receptor antagonism to predict drug-induced liver injury risk
Do you wish to request the book?
In vitro assessment of farnesoid X receptor antagonism to predict drug-induced liver injury risk
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
In vitro assessment of farnesoid X receptor antagonism to predict drug-induced liver injury risk
2020
Overview
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) continues to be a major cause of drug attrition and restrictive labeling. Given the importance of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) in bile acid homeostasis, drug-related FXR antagonism may be an important mechanism of DILI. However, a comprehensive assessment of this phenomenon broadly in the context of DILI is lacking. As such, we used an orthogonal approach comprising a FXR target gene assay in primary human hepatocytes and a commercially available FXR reporter assay to investigate the potential FXR antagonistic effects of an extensive test set of 159 compounds with and without association with clinical DILI. Data were omitted from analysis based on the presence of cytotoxicity to minimize false positive assay signals and other complications in data interpretation. Based on the experimental approaches employed and corresponding data, the prevalence of FXR antagonism was relatively low across this broad DILI test set, with 16–24% prevalence based on individual assay results or combined signals in both assays. Moreover, FXR antagonism was not highly predictive for identifying clinically relevant hepatotoxicants retrospectively, where FXR antagonist classification alone had minimal to moderate predictive value as represented by positive and negative likelihood ratios of 2.24–3.84 and 0.72–0.85, respectively. The predictivity did not increase significantly when considering only compounds with high clinical exposure (maximal or efficacious plasma exposures > 1.0 μM). In contrast, modest gains in predictive value of FXR antagonism were observed considering compounds that also inhibit bile salt export pump. In addition, we have identified novel FXR antagonistic effects of well-studied hepatotoxic drugs, including bosentan, tolcapone and ritonavir. In conclusion, this work represents a comprehensive evaluation of FXR antagonism in the context of DILI, including its overall predictivity and challenges associated with detecting this phenomenon in vitro.
