Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluation of Cottontail Pellets Collected in Suboptimal Conditions for DNA Analysis
by
CHEESEMAN, AMANDA E.
, WHIPPS, CHRISTOPHER M.
, LINDSAY, K. ALICE
, COHEN, JONATHAN B.
in
eastern cottontail
/ microsatellite
/ New England cottontail
/ noninvasive genetic sampling
/ occupancy
/ Sylvilagus floridanus
/ Tools and Technology
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluation of Cottontail Pellets Collected in Suboptimal Conditions for DNA Analysis
by
CHEESEMAN, AMANDA E.
, WHIPPS, CHRISTOPHER M.
, LINDSAY, K. ALICE
, COHEN, JONATHAN B.
in
eastern cottontail
/ microsatellite
/ New England cottontail
/ noninvasive genetic sampling
/ occupancy
/ Sylvilagus floridanus
/ Tools and Technology
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluation of Cottontail Pellets Collected in Suboptimal Conditions for DNA Analysis
by
CHEESEMAN, AMANDA E.
, WHIPPS, CHRISTOPHER M.
, LINDSAY, K. ALICE
, COHEN, JONATHAN B.
in
eastern cottontail
/ microsatellite
/ New England cottontail
/ noninvasive genetic sampling
/ occupancy
/ Sylvilagus floridanus
/ Tools and Technology
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Evaluation of Cottontail Pellets Collected in Suboptimal Conditions for DNA Analysis
Journal Article
Evaluation of Cottontail Pellets Collected in Suboptimal Conditions for DNA Analysis
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Occupancy monitoring of the New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) relies on collections of fecal pellets made following a snowfall, and subsequent genetic screening to distinguish New England cottontail pellets from those of the eastern cottontail (S. floridanus) and snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus). In years when snowy conditions are not common, less frequent sampling may result in data gaps at long-term monitoring sites, and jeopardize ongoing field research projects that rely on genetic data from fecal pellets. Such conditions occurred in the lower Hudson Valley, New York, USA, in the winter of 2015–2016, during which we collected pellets from the ground to evaluate performance of genetic testing relative to pellet quality. Pellets were categorized on overall appearance of degradation, assigned a pellet quality score, and then genetically analyzed to identify species using mitochondrial DNA. The pellets identified as being from New England cottontail were further evaluated targeting nuclear microsatellite DNA to obtain a multilocus genotype to identify individual rabbits. Species identification was possible for 89% of the highest quality pellets from the ground, and 68% in the most degraded pellets. A complete multilocus genotype was obtained in 79% of the least degraded pellets, but only 14% of the most degraded pellets. Certain genetic loci strongly influenced this success rate, with some performing better than others. Pellets collected from snow were still most reliable with 100% identified to species, and >97% of New England cottontail with a complete multilocus genotype. Thus, if researchers are genotyping rabbit pellets for applications such as abundance estimations, only the higher quality pellets from the ground or those collected from snow will likely be useful. For occupancy monitoring, a wider range of pellets may be acceptable for species identification, with the understanding that there is a tradeoff with pellet quality and successful DNA analysis. These results indicate that sampling from the ground and qualitative assessment of pellet quality using our categorization scheme is a viable method for New England cottontail monitoring in years with less snow.
Publisher
Wiley
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.