Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Improvement of practice performance in urological surgery via clinical pathway implementation
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Improvement of practice performance in urological surgery via clinical pathway implementation
Do you wish to request the book?
Improvement of practice performance in urological surgery via clinical pathway implementation
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Improvement of practice performance in urological surgery via clinical pathway implementation
2002
Overview
The purpose of this study was to compare performance measurements to evaluate the effects of clinical pathway implementation on improving practice performances in urology. Since April 1997, a total of 18 clinical pathways have been created in the urology department. Of these clinical pathways, six were implemented for endoscopic surgery, and four and eight were for minor and major surgery, respectively. Eight prominent performance measurements, which were identified as representative indicators of the practice performances, were selected in endoscopic surgery, five in minor surgery, and 11 in major surgery. Between April 1997 and March 1999, 2,883 consecutive patients, who underwent endoscopic surgery, minor surgery, and major surgery, were evaluated herein. The treatment results for patients in the first and second years of clinical pathway implementation were compared to those from the year preceding the implementation. In endoscopic surgery, five of the eight performance measurements improved significantly in the first year of implementation. Notably, three of the five improved performances continued to improve in the second year. Similarly, in minor surgery, four of the five performance measurements improved significantly following 2 years. Finally, in major urological surgery, six of the 11 performance measurements also improved significantly after 1 year; four of which continued to improve during the second year. Therefore, we conclude that patient care, which is based on the implementation of clinical pathways, can improve practice performances and facilitate medical care.
Publisher
Springer,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
Biological and medical sciences
/ Critical Pathways - organization & administration
/ Employee Performance Appraisal - organization & administration
/ Genital Diseases, Male - surgery
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration
/ Quality of Health Care - organization & administration
/ Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
