Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of stimulating dissector and intermittent stimulating probe for the identification of recurrent laryngeal nerve in reoperative setting
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of stimulating dissector and intermittent stimulating probe for the identification of recurrent laryngeal nerve in reoperative setting
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of stimulating dissector and intermittent stimulating probe for the identification of recurrent laryngeal nerve in reoperative setting
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparison of stimulating dissector and intermittent stimulating probe for the identification of recurrent laryngeal nerve in reoperative setting
2022
Overview
Purpose
Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis is one of the most devastating complications after thyroidectomy. Thyroid reoperation is a great challenge for surgeons due to anatomical distortion and fibrosis and associated with a higher risk of RLN injury. In this study, we aimed to compare stimulating dissector (SD) with intermittent stimulating probe (ISP) in thyroid reoperations. This study is the first one which compares the impact of different nerve stimulating devices in thyroid reoperations.
Methods
Included in this randomized prospective study were patients who had a bilateral subtotal thyroidectomy and would undergo a completion thyroidectomy due to a diagnosis of thyroid papillary cancer between January 2015 and January 2017. Patients were divided into two groups as SD group and ISP group. Age, sex, nerve amplitudes, latencies, the first identification time of RLN and complications were compared in both groups.
Results
A total of 32 patients, 16 in both groups, were included in the study. The demographics, nerve signal amplitudes and latencies were similar in both groups (
p
> 0.05). The mean RLN identification time in the SD group was 17.4 ± 4.3 min, which was significantly shorter than those in the ISP group (mean 21.3 ± 3.9) (
p
= 0.014).
Conclusion
The first identification of RLN in the thyroid reoperations was faster with the use of SD than with the use of the ISP. Since the electromyographic amplitudes of RLN and vagus nerve with using SD were similar to the bipolar ISP, SD can be used safely for thyroid reoperations.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer Nature B.V
