Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Adaptive radiotherapy dosimetry in a challenging geometry: A model gas-filled tissue expander in a helical TomoTherapy beam
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Adaptive radiotherapy dosimetry in a challenging geometry: A model gas-filled tissue expander in a helical TomoTherapy beam
Do you wish to request the book?
Adaptive radiotherapy dosimetry in a challenging geometry: A model gas-filled tissue expander in a helical TomoTherapy beam
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Adaptive radiotherapy dosimetry in a challenging geometry: A model gas-filled tissue expander in a helical TomoTherapy beam
2022
Overview
Helical TomoTherapy treatment and delivery systems (Accuray Inc, Sunnyvale, USA) allow off-line adaptation of radiotherapy treatments, with dose calculations that use MV computed tomography (CT) data acquired at treatment. This study aimed to assess the potential dosimetric effects of a gas-filled temporary tissue expander (TTE) on the accuracy of breast radiotherapy dose calculations from both the TomoTherapy treatment planning system (TPS), which uses kV CT data, and the TomoTherapy adaptive radiotherapy (ART) system, which uses MV CT data. A TomoTherapy treatment plan was created and delivered to a 3D-printed rectilinear model of a breast with implanted gas-filled TTE, including a stainless steel CO 2 container, and film measurements of the delivered dose were compared against dose calculations from the TPS and ART systems. The film measurements showed that the TomoTherapy TPS provided comparatively accurate dose calculations in the ~550 cm 2 volume of air that modelled the gas filling of the TTE and within the surrounding tissue-equivalent materials, except in regions where the beam was transmitted through the stainless steel CO 2 container, possibly due to the volume of stainless steel being over-estimated in the kV CT images that were used to generate the treatment plan. The ART system provided more accurate dose calculations than the TPS in regions affected by the stainless steel container, but also over-estimated the dose in the air within the TTE. These results suggest that the TomoTherapy TPS and ART systems could be used to produce reliable dose calculations of breast treatments in the presence of gas-filled TTEs, if kV CT imaging options are chosen to avoid artefacts and minimise the need for density over-rides and if treatment targets that include only clinically relevant tissues, and exclude all TTE components, are used to evaluate and compare the doses calculated by both systems.
Publisher
IOP Publishing
