Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Examining Second Language (L2) Learners’ Engagement with AWE-Teacher Integrated Feedback in a Technology-Empowered Context
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Examining Second Language (L2) Learners’ Engagement with AWE-Teacher Integrated Feedback in a Technology-Empowered Context
Do you wish to request the book?
Examining Second Language (L2) Learners’ Engagement with AWE-Teacher Integrated Feedback in a Technology-Empowered Context
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Examining Second Language (L2) Learners’ Engagement with AWE-Teacher Integrated Feedback in a Technology-Empowered Context
2024
Overview
While studies on teacher written feedback and automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback have proliferated in recent decades, little attention has been paid to how AWE-teacher integrated feedback would influence students’ engagement and their writing performance in second language (L2) writing. Against this backdrop, a quasi-experimental design was adopted to address this important gap. In our study, an intervention was implemented in two classes of English major sophomores in China, with a treatment group receiving AWE-teacher integrated feedback and a comparison group receiving teacher feedback. Data were collected from multiple sources over a 13-week semester to explore the Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with the integrated feedback and their writing performance. Results showed that the students in the treatment group engaged with feedback more profoundly in behavior and cognition than those in the comparison group while both groups demonstrated similar affective engagement. Furthermore, compared with the comparison group, the treatment group improved their writing performance in content, organization, vocabulary, and language use significantly. Important implications are also discussed.
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore,Springer Nature B.V
