Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Ne Bis In Idem Principle in Tax Law: European and Italian Frameworks
by
Fedele, Stefania Lotito
in
Case law
/ Cooperation
/ Courts
/ Criminal law
/ Criminal procedure
/ EU membership
/ European Convention on Human Rights
/ European tax law and case law, Italy, ne bis in idem principle, fiscal administration
/ Fines & penalties
/ Human rights
/ International cooperation
/ Italian language
/ Jurisdiction
/ Law
/ Legal system
/ Offenses
/ Oppression
/ Power
/ Prohibition
/ Punitive damages
/ Repression (Defense mechanism)
/ Self concept
/ Social security taxes
/ Sovereignty
/ State
/ Supranationalism
/ Talking
/ Tax legislation
/ Taxation
/ Trials
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Ne Bis In Idem Principle in Tax Law: European and Italian Frameworks
by
Fedele, Stefania Lotito
in
Case law
/ Cooperation
/ Courts
/ Criminal law
/ Criminal procedure
/ EU membership
/ European Convention on Human Rights
/ European tax law and case law, Italy, ne bis in idem principle, fiscal administration
/ Fines & penalties
/ Human rights
/ International cooperation
/ Italian language
/ Jurisdiction
/ Law
/ Legal system
/ Offenses
/ Oppression
/ Power
/ Prohibition
/ Punitive damages
/ Repression (Defense mechanism)
/ Self concept
/ Social security taxes
/ Sovereignty
/ State
/ Supranationalism
/ Talking
/ Tax legislation
/ Taxation
/ Trials
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The Ne Bis In Idem Principle in Tax Law: European and Italian Frameworks
by
Fedele, Stefania Lotito
in
Case law
/ Cooperation
/ Courts
/ Criminal law
/ Criminal procedure
/ EU membership
/ European Convention on Human Rights
/ European tax law and case law, Italy, ne bis in idem principle, fiscal administration
/ Fines & penalties
/ Human rights
/ International cooperation
/ Italian language
/ Jurisdiction
/ Law
/ Legal system
/ Offenses
/ Oppression
/ Power
/ Prohibition
/ Punitive damages
/ Repression (Defense mechanism)
/ Self concept
/ Social security taxes
/ Sovereignty
/ State
/ Supranationalism
/ Talking
/ Tax legislation
/ Taxation
/ Trials
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The Ne Bis In Idem Principle in Tax Law: European and Italian Frameworks
Journal Article
The Ne Bis In Idem Principle in Tax Law: European and Italian Frameworks
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In the national and supranational legal area, the need to address the ne bis in idem principle is justified by the growing interest aroused by the most recent pronouncements of the European Courts. The principle prohibits anyone who has already been acquitted or convicted in a previous trial from being tried again. Moreover, it has become a fundamental right enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. The interest in the issue also derives from the need to understand whether the approach of the Italian legal system – or any other similar national order – can be considered compliant with European tax law and case law, based on the definitions of criminal and tax offences. Thus, talking about a European legal space means rethinking the idea of punitive power in a dimension that tends to be ‘solidarity-based’. The State can consider itself impervious to repressive demands from outside but is instead called to cooperate actively to safeguard its own guarantees. The traditional self-referential conception of criminal repression effectively summarised in the expression ‘punitive sovereignty’ gives way to an idea of jurisdiction that draws directly from the principle of mutual recognition. In this scenario, the profile of the protection of the individual from the risk of a duplication of the exercise of punitive power for the same fact in different states assumes the role of the first magnitude. Hence, there is a need to act on two levels at the same time: to seek solutions aimed at resolving possible conflicts of jurisdiction (prohibition of competing prosecutions for the same fact), and to attribute, within each Member State, preclusive effects to the previously judged foreigner (ne bis in idem).
Publisher
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, Journal Uprava/Administration,University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.