Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Immediately Placed Single Locking-Taper Implants in the Aesthetic Area of Upper Maxilla: A Short-Term Pilot Study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Immediately Placed Single Locking-Taper Implants in the Aesthetic Area of Upper Maxilla: A Short-Term Pilot Study
Do you wish to request the book?
Immediately Placed Single Locking-Taper Implants in the Aesthetic Area of Upper Maxilla: A Short-Term Pilot Study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Immediately Placed Single Locking-Taper Implants in the Aesthetic Area of Upper Maxilla: A Short-Term Pilot Study
2025
Overview
Background: As the rehabilitation of the upper anterior maxilla primarily requires high predictability of successful aesthetic outcomes, procedures of immediate implant placement are frequently employed. The aim of this pilot study was to retrospectively evaluate the short-term outcomes of a protocol of immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets, followed by immediate non-functional provisional restorations. Methods: Patients were treated for the replacement of maxillary central or lateral incisors, or cuspid teeth with a single-crown locking-taper implant. Clinical and photographic records were retrospectively compared between the teeth prior to extraction (T0) and restorations one year after prosthetic loading (T1). Outcomes were analyzed using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES), according to the patient’s phenotype (thin/thick), with or without the use of connective tissue graft (CTG). Results: The overall mean PES of 25 implants treated was 9.24 ± 2.36 at T0 and 9.60 ± 1.70 at T1. Comparison of groups between T0 and T1 revealed significant PES variations (p = 0.04), with the best and the worst scores, respectively, registered for thin + CTG group (from 7.50 ± 1.91 to 9.75 ± 2.87) and thin group (from 11.33 ± 2.33 to 10 ± 0.89); moderate increases were assessed for thick group (from 8.44 ± 2.40 to 9.44 ± 2.12) and thick + CTG group (from 9.50 ± 1.04 to 9.33 ± 0.81). Conclusions: Within the limits of a short-term analysis of a small number of patients, immediate implant rehabilitation for aesthetic areas of the upper maxilla can be assumed as a safe and predictable protocol. Concomitant use of CTG seems to provide beneficial effects in thin phenotypes, not any additional value in thick phenotypes.
Publisher
MDPI AG
Subject
