Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
An improved NSGA‐II for the dynamic economic emission dispatch with the charging/discharging of plug‐in electric vehicles and home‐distributed photovoltaic generation
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
An improved NSGA‐II for the dynamic economic emission dispatch with the charging/discharging of plug‐in electric vehicles and home‐distributed photovoltaic generation
Do you wish to request the book?
An improved NSGA‐II for the dynamic economic emission dispatch with the charging/discharging of plug‐in electric vehicles and home‐distributed photovoltaic generation
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
An improved NSGA‐II for the dynamic economic emission dispatch with the charging/discharging of plug‐in electric vehicles and home‐distributed photovoltaic generation
2024
Overview
This paper investigates four energy utilization scenarios with or without home‐distributed photovoltaic generation (HDPG) to reduce the generation cost and pollutant emission of the dynamic economic emission dispatch with the charging/discharging of plug‐in electric vehicles (DEED‐PEV). The first scenario considers valley filling for the charging of PEVs. The second scenario combines valley filling and peak shaving for the charging and discharging of PEVs. The third scenario adds peak shaving of HDPG to the first scenario, followed by the peak shaving with the discharging of PEVs. The fourth scenario rearranges the distribution of photovoltaic (PV) power for the third scenario, and the PV power in the afternoon is stored by a photovoltaic energy storage system (PESS) and consumed in the evening. A universal procedure is designed for the valley filling and peak shaving of the four scenarios, which is beneficial for determining the filled and shaved loads with respect to certain time intervals. An NSGA‐II method based on a modified crossover and an elimination of individuals (NSGA‐II‐MCEI) is proposed for the multiobjective optimization of DEED‐PEV. The modified crossover can improve the convergence of NSGA‐II‐MCEI, and the elimination operator can maintain the evenness of the nondominated solutions. According to experimental results, scenario 4 achieves cost savings of 95386.62$, 85636.87 $ , and 6776.85 $, respectively, for Scenarios 1, 2, and 3, and it reaches emission reductions of 27617.64 kg, 17252.71 kg, and 220.98 kg, respectively, for scenarios 1, 2, and 3. Also, scenario 4 outperforms the other three scenarios for three weather conditions such as sunny day, cloudy day, and rainy day. Dynamic economic emission dispatch with the plug‐in electric vehicles and home distributed photovoltaic generation.
Publisher
Wiley
