Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Long-term outcomes after “Zero X-ray” arrhythmia ablation
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Long-term outcomes after “Zero X-ray” arrhythmia ablation
Do you wish to request the book?
Long-term outcomes after “Zero X-ray” arrhythmia ablation
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Long-term outcomes after “Zero X-ray” arrhythmia ablation
2019
Overview
PurposeRadiation exposure related to conventional tachyarrhythmia radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) carries small but definite risk for both patients and operators. Today, non-fluoroscopic mapping systems enable to perform catheter ablation with minimal or zero fluoroscopy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients who had undergone “Zero X-ray” ablation, since no information is available on the very long-term benefits.MethodsA total of 272 arrhythmias in 266 patients have been treated with catheter ablation by means of a zero-ray approach guided only by a nonconventional mapping system (EnSite NavX™, Ensite™ Velocity™ mapping system; subsequently Ensite™ Precision™ Abbott, St. Paul, MN). Fluoroscopy was never used.ResultsOver a period of 6 years, patients were followed up for an average of 2.9 ± 1.6 years. A 100% rate of acute success was observed in the study population, with a complication rate of 0.8%. Chronic success was achieved in 90.8% of the total number of procedures (272). Patients in whom the same arrhythmia recurred during follow-up underwent to a redo catheter ablation procedure in 60.0% of cases, while the remaining 40.0% underwent pharmacological treatment. A new post-ablation arrhythmia occurred in 7.7% of the sample.ConclusionsThe non-fluoroscopic approach is a feasible and safe alternative to fluoroscopy for arrhythmias ablation. This method ensures low complications rates, high acute procedural success rates, and comparable long-term outcomes with clinical benefits for both patients and physicians. The complete elimination of fluoroscopy during catheter ablation is advantageous and does not reduce patient safety.
