Journal Article

Feasibility of using a pragmatic trials model to compare two primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis regimens (ciprofloxacin versus G-CSF) in patients receiving docetaxel-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer (REaCT-TC)

Hutton, Brian, Mallick, Ranjeeta, Sienkiewicz, Marta, Hilton, John, Kehoe, Anne, Joy, Anil, Stober, Carol, Ibrahim, Mohammed FK, Clemons, Mark, Price-Hiller, Julie, Verma, Shailendra, Zhu, Xiaofu, Vandermeer, Lisa, Fergusson, Dean, Mazzarello, Sasha

2019

Overview

PurposeOptimal primary febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis (i.e. ciprofloxacin or granulocyte-colony stimulating factors [G-CSF]) for patients receiving docetaxel-cyclophosphamide (TC) chemotherapy is unknown. We assessed the feasibility of using a novel pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial to compare these standard-of-care options.MethodsEarly-stage breast cancer patients receiving TC chemotherapy were randomised to either ciprofloxacin or G-CSF. Trial methodology consists of broad eligibility criteria, simply-defined endpoints, integrated consent model incorporating oral consent, and web-based randomisation in the clinic. Primary feasibility endpoints included patient and physician engagement (if > 50% of patients approached agree to participate and if > 50% of physicians approached patients for the study). Secondary clinical endpoints included the following: first occurrence rates of FN, treatment-related hospitalisation, or chemotherapy dose reduction/delay/discontinuation, as well as patient satisfaction with the oral consent process.ResultsOf 204 patients approached, 91.2% (186/204) agreed to randomisation. Sixteen of twenty (80%) participating medical oncologists randomised patients. Median patient age was 57.7 (range 31.8–84.1). The 186 patients received 557 cycles of chemotherapy. Overall incidences of first events by patient (n = 186) were as follows: FN (18/186, 21.43%), treatment-related hospitalisation (11/186, 13.10%), chemotherapy reduction (19/186, 22.62%), chemotherapy discontinuation (16/186, 19.05%), and chemotherapy delays (5/186, 5.95%). A total of 37.77% (69/186) of patients and 12.39% (69/557) of chemotherapy cycles had at least one of these first events. Patients were highly satisfied with the oral consent process.ConclusionThis study met its feasibility endpoints. This model offers a means of comparing standard-of-care treatments in a practical and cost-efficient manner.Trial registrationTrial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02173262

• Publisher: Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Antibiotics / Breast cancer / Cancer / Chemotherapy / Consent / Discontinued / Feasibility / Frequency of occurrence / Hospitalization / Informed consent / Medical treatment / Neutropenia / Oncologists / Patient satisfaction / Patients / Physicians / Practitioner patient relationship / Registration / Satisfaction / Treatment methods