Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Multi-objective optimization of series-parallel system with mixed subsystems failure dependencies using NSGA-II and MOHH
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Multi-objective optimization of series-parallel system with mixed subsystems failure dependencies using NSGA-II and MOHH
Do you wish to request the book?
Multi-objective optimization of series-parallel system with mixed subsystems failure dependencies using NSGA-II and MOHH
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Multi-objective optimization of series-parallel system with mixed subsystems failure dependencies using NSGA-II and MOHH
2024
Overview
In complex systems, failure dependencies play a crucial role in determining their overall performance. This paper explores the multi-objective optimization of series-parallel systems with mixed failure dependencies. By optimizing system cost and availability, the study aims to identify the most efficient redundancy and repair strategies. Two optimization algorithms, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) and a novel multi-objective algorithm named the multi-objective hoopoe heuristic (MOHH), are utilized alongside constraint handling techniques to produce Pareto fronts. These fronts illustrate the trade-offs between cost and availability. Additionally, a fuzzy decision method is utilized to determine the best compromise solutions from each optimization technique. Comparing the results, NSGA-II consistently outperforms MOHH in providing better compromise solutions across five independent runs. However, MOHH demonstrates a better standard deviation in its performance.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Sage Publications Ltd,SAGE Publishing
