Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with different type of mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a Chinese multicenter retrospective cohort study
by
Yu, Jian
, Liu, Yahui
, Huang, Xiaobing
, Cai, Zhiwei
, Jiang, Zhongyi
, Ouyang, Guoqing
, Peng, Bing
, Yin, Xinmin
, Xu, Jie
, Hong, Defei
, Bai, Xueli
, Liu, Jianhua
, Xiong, Yong
, Zhong, Xiaosheng
, Cai, Yunqiang
, Zheng, Shangyou
, Liu, Jun
, Chen, Rufu
in
Cohort analysis
/ Laparoscopy
/ Morbidity
/ Pancreatic cancer
/ Pancreaticoduodenectomy
/ Surgical outcomes
2023
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with different type of mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a Chinese multicenter retrospective cohort study
by
Yu, Jian
, Liu, Yahui
, Huang, Xiaobing
, Cai, Zhiwei
, Jiang, Zhongyi
, Ouyang, Guoqing
, Peng, Bing
, Yin, Xinmin
, Xu, Jie
, Hong, Defei
, Bai, Xueli
, Liu, Jianhua
, Xiong, Yong
, Zhong, Xiaosheng
, Cai, Yunqiang
, Zheng, Shangyou
, Liu, Jun
, Chen, Rufu
in
Cohort analysis
/ Laparoscopy
/ Morbidity
/ Pancreatic cancer
/ Pancreaticoduodenectomy
/ Surgical outcomes
2023
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with different type of mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a Chinese multicenter retrospective cohort study
by
Yu, Jian
, Liu, Yahui
, Huang, Xiaobing
, Cai, Zhiwei
, Jiang, Zhongyi
, Ouyang, Guoqing
, Peng, Bing
, Yin, Xinmin
, Xu, Jie
, Hong, Defei
, Bai, Xueli
, Liu, Jianhua
, Xiong, Yong
, Zhong, Xiaosheng
, Cai, Yunqiang
, Zheng, Shangyou
, Liu, Jun
, Chen, Rufu
in
Cohort analysis
/ Laparoscopy
/ Morbidity
/ Pancreatic cancer
/ Pancreaticoduodenectomy
/ Surgical outcomes
2023
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with different type of mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a Chinese multicenter retrospective cohort study
Journal Article
The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with different type of mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a Chinese multicenter retrospective cohort study
2023
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BackgroundThe results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction (LPD-MPVRs) for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma are rarely reported. The aim of present study was to explore the short- and long-term outcomes of different type of LPD-MPVRs.MethodsPatients who underwent LPD-MPVRs in 14 Chinese high-volume pancreatic centers between June 2014 and December 2020 were selected and compared.ResultsIn total, 142 patients were included and were divided into primary closure (n = 56), end-end anastomosis (n = 43), or interposition graft (n = 43). Median overall survival (OS) and median progress-free survival (PFS) between primary closure and end-end anastomosis had no difference (both P > 0.05). As compared to primary closure and end-end anastomosis, interposition graft had the worst median OS (12 months versus 19 months versus 17 months, P = 0.001) and the worst median PFS (6 months versus 15 months versus 12 months, P < 0.000). As compared to primary closure, interposition graft had almost double risk in major morbidity (16.3 percent versus 8.9 percent) and about triple risk (10 percent versus 3.6 percent) in 90-day mortality, while End-end anastomosis had only one fourth major morbidity (2.3 percent versus 8.9 percent). Multivariate analysis revealed postoperation hospital stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, number of positive lymph nodes had negative impact on OS, while R0, R1 surgical margin had protective effect on OS. Postoperative hospital stay had negative impact on PFS, while primary closure, end-end anastomosis, short-term vascular patency, and short-term vascular stenosis positively related to PFS.ConclusionsIn LPD-MPVRs, interposition graft had the worst OS, the worst PFS, the highest rate of major morbidity, and the highest rate of 90-day mortality. While there were no differences in OS and PFS between primary closure and end-end anastomosis.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.