Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Decreased Leak Rate and Need for Reintervention with Use of Closed Suction Calibration System: a Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Project
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Decreased Leak Rate and Need for Reintervention with Use of Closed Suction Calibration System: a Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Project
Do you wish to request the book?
Decreased Leak Rate and Need for Reintervention with Use of Closed Suction Calibration System: a Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Project
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Decreased Leak Rate and Need for Reintervention with Use of Closed Suction Calibration System: a Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Project
2021
Overview
Abstract Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) continues to grow in popularity as a primary bariatric procedure. The purpose of this study is to determine if leak rates and need for subsequent interventions are changed by the standardized use of a closed suction calibration system (CSCS) at a high-volume urban hospital.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, on SG patients. All cases performed in 2018 were completed with a closed suction calibration system. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative variables, and outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared test were used to compare the two groups. Logistic regression models were adjusted for patient- and procedure-specific factors.ResultsFour hundred ninety cases were performed before and 195 after institution of the CSCS. Groups were similar in most characteristics, including median body mass index (BMI) (46.4 vs 45.8 kg/m2, p = 0.79). Those in the closed suction cohort were more likely to have OSA requiring therapy (32.4% vs 46.6%, p < 0.01) and to have their cases performed robotically (55.4% vs 39.6%, p = 0.02). Post introduction of the CSCS, the overall leak rate was 0% (1.4% vs 0%, p = 0.09); overall need for postoperative interventions decreased (9.6% vs 2.6%, p = 0.009). After adjustment, a 69% decrease was observed in need for related additional intervention [aOR 0.31 (0.12–0.81), p = 0.017].ConclusionThe use of a standardized closed suction calibration system resulted in overall decreased leak rates, which was associated with a clinically significant decrease in additional interventions.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
