Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Right ventricular diameter predicts all-cause mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Right ventricular diameter predicts all-cause mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Do you wish to request the book?
Right ventricular diameter predicts all-cause mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Right ventricular diameter predicts all-cause mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
2019
Overview
Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is helpful to differentiate heart failure (HF) phenotype in clinical practice. The aim of the study was to identify simple echocardiographic predictors of post-discharge all-cause mortality in hospitalized HF patients. Patients with acute HF (75 ± 9.8 years), classified in preserved (≥ 50%) and reduced (< 50%) EF (HFpEF and HFrEF, respectively), were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was of 25.4 months. Patients definitively analyzed were 135. At multivariate Cox model, right ventricular diameter (RVd), inferior vena cava diameter (IVCd) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) resulted to be significantly associated with all-cause mortality in HFpEF (HR 2.4, p = 0.04; HR 1.06, p = 0.02; HR 1.02, p = 0.01), whereas, left atrial volume (LAV) was significantly associated with mortality in HFrEF (HR 1.06, p = 0.006). Excluding LAV from the model, only COPD remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 2.15, p = 0.04) in HFrEF. At Kaplan–Meier analysis, no differences of survival between HFrEF and HFpEF were found, however, significantly increased all-cause mortality for higher values of basal-RVd, BUN, and IVCd (log-rank p = 0.0065, 0.0063, 0.0005) in HFpEF, and for COPD and higher LAV (log-rank p = 0.0046, p = 0.033) in HFrEF. These data are indicative that in patients hospitalized with HF, EF is not a suitable predictor of long-term all-cause mortality, whereas, right ventricular volumetric remodeling and IVCd have a prognostic role in HFpEF as well as LAV in HFrEF. Our study suggests that besides EF, other echocardiographic parameters are helpful to optimize the phenotyping and prognostic stratification of HF.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
