Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Macular hole closure patterns: an updated classification
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Macular hole closure patterns: an updated classification
Do you wish to request the book?
Macular hole closure patterns: an updated classification
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Macular hole closure patterns: an updated classification
2020
Overview
BackgroundThe classification of macular hole closure patterns (MHCPs) currently relies on time domain OCT allowing only “open” and “closed” statuses or is based on inner foveal contour shape. Both classification types give no information on retinal layer reconstitution. Novel sophisticated surgical techniques lead to previously unknown MHCPs, outdating existing classifications and urging new ones. The purpose of the present study is to introduce a new classification allowing proper description of all MHCPs resulting from newer surgeries and based on the restoration of retinal layers.MethodsRetrospective analysis of patients undergoing MH surgery with five different surgical techniques was performed. MHCPs were classified according to spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Type 0: open MH (0A: flat margin, 0B: elevated, 0C: oedematous); type 1: closed MHs (1A: reconstitution all retinal layers; 1B interruption of the external layers; 1C interruption of internal layers); type 2: MH closed with autologous or heterologous filling tissue interrupting the normal foveal layered anatomy (2A: filling tissue through all layers; 2B reconstitution of normal inner retinal layers; 2C reconstitution of normal outer retinal layers; 2D H-shaped bridging of filling tissue).ResultsClosure rate was 95.2% (241/253). Surgical technique and vision correlated to closure pattern (p < 0.001). Type 1 MHCPs had the best post-operative visual acuity (VA) compared with type 2 and type 0 (p < 0.001). MHCPs 1A and 1C performed better than all others. MHCP at months 1 and 3 changed in 42/254 (16.5%) and remained stable in 212/254 (83.5%). Improvement in vision was higher in eyes with shifting closure pattern (0.57 ± 0.33 vs 0.51 ± 0.48 logMAR; p 0.021).ConclusionMHCP classification based on retinal layer restoration properly comprises post-operative anatomic morphologies. MHCPs correlate the surgical technique and post-operative visual outcomes.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
