Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Formal models of source reliability
by
von Sydow, Momme
, Hahn, Ulrike
, Merdes, Christoph
in
Bayes, Thomas (1702-1761)
/ Education
/ Epistemology
/ Logic
/ Metaphysics
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Language
/ Philosophy of Science
/ Reliability
/ S.I. : Reliability
/ Source materials
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Formal models of source reliability
by
von Sydow, Momme
, Hahn, Ulrike
, Merdes, Christoph
in
Bayes, Thomas (1702-1761)
/ Education
/ Epistemology
/ Logic
/ Metaphysics
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Language
/ Philosophy of Science
/ Reliability
/ S.I. : Reliability
/ Source materials
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Formal models of source reliability
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The paper introduces, compares and contrasts formal models of source reliability proposed in the epistemology literature, in particular the prominent models of Bovens and Hartmann (Bayesian epistemology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003) and Olsson (Episteme 8(02):127–143, 2011). All are Bayesian models seeking to provide normative guidance, yet they differ subtly in assumptions and resulting behavior. Models are evaluated both on conceptual grounds and through simulations, and the relationship between models is clarified. The simulations both show surprising similarities and highlight relevant differences between these models. Most importantly, however, our evaluations reveal that important normative concerns arguably remain unresolved. The philosophical implications of this for testimony are discussed.
Publisher
Springer Science + Business Media,Springer Netherlands,Springer Nature B.V
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.